Stop Letting Them Get Away with It!
Cyberbullying Report
Anti-Bullying and Internet Safety Services


The Epic Saga of David Doria on the Internets

The Epic Saga of David Doria on the Internets
The Epic Saga of David Doria on the Internets
Report #: 139
Date Reported: Monday, June 13, 2011
Author: STDCarriers.com
Status: Past Incident
Severity: High - Cyberstalking
Primary Weapon: Cross Site Stalking
Specific Location: Riverside
City/Local Area: Inland Empire - Riverside and San Bernardino Counties
State/Territory: California
Region: United States
More Info: Doria on Internet Ownage

In late 2009 I started getting angry emails from David Doria in Riverside, California about a report someone had written on one of my websites accusing him of having a disease. Eventually the situation escalated into ridiculous emails, hundreds of comments, a news story, a lawsuit, and a cross site stalking incident.

I can't remember the first time I got an email from David Doria, but I know it must have been a long one. The man could have been a best selling author by now if he had just used his time constructively instead of bothering me with his problems. When he first started complaining I responded to him like I do with most people, but he objected to the sites record removal policies more than anyone else ever has. He started off with some basic arguments related to known pitfalls of std testing, but eventually his messages escalated to the point of becoming ridiculous. In one messaged he demanded $150,000 and $3,000 a day if I did not take the report down. I told him his monetary demands were more ridiculous than Dr. Evil and his $100 Billion in Austin Powers, but even though he stopped sending me monetary demands things just got weirder after that.

From January of 2010 into March he started feuding with Mike Basciano and some woman on the comment boards of his profile as well as a site called Internet Ownage where a profile of him still exists. Eventually I had to kick Basciano off the site for violating the TOU by accusing Doria of a crime he was never convicted of. I told the news in New York state what Basicano did and he ended up becoming the subject of a news story. Despite deleting his parents address from comment boards and banning Basciano he still kept trying to use the behavior of commentators as grounds to get the report removed. Unfortunately I could not remove it because despite how much misconduct had occurred none of it was done by the author.

I don't recall ever hearing from him again until July or August of that year. At that point the author had removed the report for some reason. Doria used the removal of the report by the author in an effort to persuade me to release information about that user. I denied his request because I never release information on users in good standing and that includes users who deactivate reports because I do not want users to fear correcting a mistake that they make, so if a report is deleted clean results are needed to violate the user. He did send me image files that he said were pictures of clean test results, but that was not an acceptable means to send results at the time and even now the sites policies only allow attorneys to send results electronically on behalf of clients. Eventually he said he lost the lawsuit because he didn't have enough evidence and he blamed me for that.

He also started complaining about Google results for the report that got removed, but they were not my fault. Someone had posted a copy of his report on another website just long enough for Google to index the page before redirecting it to my site.

Already furious over losing his lawsuit he began demanding that I remove his threatening emails from the threats section, but I refused because they were too funny. Then he started staking me from site to site for a short while spamming comment boards with accusations of giving people malware into every news story he could find about my site. When I shut down the threats section his emails were removed and I redirected the old pages to this summary.
Dr. Evil $100 Billion Dollars

 
STDCarriers.com
8/12/2011 - oops looks like I accidentally wrote d-uce instead of a word for a female product that I still can't seem to get past my filter for the first word while the word Duce shouldn't have been flagged.
STDCarriers.com
8/12/2011 - When it comes to O'Brien I totally see what you mean about calling him his last name being weird. It started when he moved into my building in Eugene and we already had a guy there named George, so we started calling him by his last name. We had a similar incident with a second guy named Ben, but he was kind of a D-uce so I successfully nicknamed him Number 2 before eventually changing it to D-uce, but the second one was used exclusively behind his back for the most part. D-uce shouldn't have a - in it, but it looks like I am a victim of my own word filer.
STDCarriers.com
8/12/2011 - I also want to let you know that my decision to use the image was largely based on the IO article still being online. I figured it would be better for you if the image result directed people her instead of there. Technically I didn't even link to IO because I serve off site links using JavaScript and a programmed redirect to prevent SEO link spam to bad neighborhoods, so search engines won't consider that a link to help IO. I also want to apologize for being so rude with my first draft of the report, but I knew you would be mad no matter what I wrote, so I wanted more room for compromise.
STDCarriers.com
8/12/2011 - @Cryrus in an effort to take a step towards ending this cycle of bullying I've edited the report to make it nicer. I do not support the accusations made against you by Internet Ownage at all. In fact I linked to it as proof of people bullying you after clearly stating that you were falsely accused of a crime. I used the "BULLIED" graphic for the image to make it clear that you're a victim of cyberbullying even though you did become a perpetrator at one point. If you look at O'Brien's research on this site you will see that it is quite common for people bullied to start bullying people.
Cryrus
8/10/2011 - @cyberbullyingreport

thank you for the bluntly honest responses.

My stance has not changed, and I would like to quote specifically, "You were well aware of what would result from putting his name in the title of the report and file name of the image."

On top of this, I submit that Cyrus' link to internetownage accuses me of rape, a claim which Cyrus has already shown to be false. Cyrus supports the same accusation here by posting a link to it. Why?

O'Brien, if you are not Cyrus, you should be realize by now that the drama attracted by this profile is purposeful. This is your partner.
CyberBullyingReport.com
8/10/2011 - Oh, one more thing @Cryrus. You are underestimating his reliance on income from the internet, but also overestimating it the way you indicated. He only gets about 30% of the ad revenue on this site and others with the exception of his first site which he gave up on for the most part in the fall of 2009. Where he really makes his money is off other people's websites specifically local businesses who he provides with various services that are mostly SEO services, but he also helps them with stuff like copywriting, press release marketing, and back end development stuff (SQL, PHP, C# coding, ETC.).
CyberBullyingReport.com
8/10/2011 - Anyway I've said my bit for now. @Cryrus I give my word that I will not delete your comments unless I know them to contain something that is false, spam, or off topic. The latter means that what you post must be relevant and I say this at the expense of sounding like Cyrus who is a bit too rigid on what he considers to be relevant, but he is just a scientific thinker. For instance if you were talking about cigarettes and flavor he would consider cancer irrelevant to the topic because cancer has no flavor. Still I won't allow character assassination based on inaccurate web pages.
CyberBullyingReport.com
8/10/2011 - @STDCarriers.com as your business partner and one of your few friends that don't just use you because of stuff you have I'm probably the best one to tell you this. You need to stop exploiting people who are not as smart as you or not as familiar with certain legalities or technical subjects as you are. He may be breaking the law, but I knew his motive before I Googled him and even though you are not legally or technically responsible for content on Google I know you too well. You were well aware of what would result from putting his name in the title of the report and file name of the image.
CyberBullyingReport.com
8/10/2011 - Both of you need to knock this off and find better things to do. @anonymous I laughed at the name "Cryrus" too, but I only deleted comments by that user containing statements I knew for a fact to be false, specifically accusing Cyrus of being a convicted felon which he is not. @STDCarriers.com good Magedson comparison you're like him, but my age and as much as I like you the only thing that makes you different is letting people post free rebuttals. Personally I think both of these guys have the same problem in that they get defensive and go off on people online who insult them in any way.
STDCarriers.com
8/10/2011 - When you register it please paste the URL on this comment board since I have more important things to do than look for it. Then I will decide whether having ICANN take it from you and using that as an example of how to combat cybersquatters would be more profitable than the free advertising it would give me. I don't know where you got the idea that you could decrease my income, but the suggestion of it shows that you don't know how online advertising works. Its all based on traffic, so any site like the one your thinking of will ultimately make me money.
Cryrus
8/9/2011 - I will confirm my identity right here by telling you that I e-mailed you from a student address. Anything you have to say, you can say here. Just know that you are not delaying my actions with this argument. I need to make a trip into town to get a PO box, or the site would be registered and populated already. You are underestimating the potential of this site, or i am overestimating your dignity and reliance on income from the internet. Either way, how you feel about the site is irrelevant. It will serve its intended purpose.
STDCarriers.com
8/9/2011 - You should also consider that unlike most people I am immune to threats that involve damaging my online reputation because I can always explain them to people who matter as just the work of random moronic web users angry over some edgy venture(s) of mine. That is because I'm in the same bracket as the Ripoff Report guy. Check out his results at http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ed+magedson. He has all kinds of ridiculous results about him on Google like this one http://www.webspawner.com/users/sharkiebites/index.html obviously written by a stalker or group of people stalking him.
STDCarriers.com
8/9/2011 - To be honest I'm not even convinced that you are who you say you are. O'Brien gave me your email address which is different than the one you signed up with on the first site, so for all I know you're just some random looser with nothing better to do than screw with me for reasons probably related to content on any number of sites I own. I tell you what, contact me using your previous email address at my STD Carriers account and I'll give you a better answer that I can give you here. Its the only way you can convince me of you identity and if you do so I hope you will like my response.
Cryrus
8/9/2011 - Your only option is the complete removal of this article. Anything less will warrant the registry of a domain which tarnishes your name to the full extent of my abilities. I will not be held legally responsible for damage to your name in the process of clearing my own. You are obligated to mitigate your damages, which you could do by removing this article. You are choosing not to. I assure you that your legal threats are based on poor understanding of the law and of this situation. They do not bother me, and I welcome you to pursue me on whatever legal grounds you would like to.
STDCarriers.com
8/8/2011 - Despite the threat I am open to compromise here because I have always hoped that this site could be a useful tool for people to settle their differences. I wouldn't have a problem editing the report and make it a little less damaging given how long ago the initial incident took place. I'm thinking specifically of replacing the parts of email I quoted with just vague language indicating that you disputed the report, argued a bit, and that we just never agreed on stuff.
STDCarriers.com
8/8/2011 - FYI - By threatening me with domain squatting in advance you have committed the felony of coercion under Oregon Statute 163.275 (https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/163.275) which clearly states that you cannot compel someone to "engage in conduct from which the other person has a legal right to abstain" in this case my right to abstain from removing this report for which you have threatened to "engage in conduct constituting a crime" if I do not. The crime being a violation of the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act by registering the domain in bad faith.
Cryrus
8/8/2011 - I want you to know that I am very close to simply registering a domain containing your full name and using it to counteract the damage that you are doing to me with this profile. When I say very close, I mean it's the next thing that I'm going to do if this profile is not removed and you continue to argue and delete my posts.
Cryrus
8/8/2011 - hmm. Cyrus, i second the comment about you calling your close friend by his last name. more than a little odd. you have already admitted that I have proven myself beyond a reasonable doubt. If you did not have a reasonable doubt, you would accept the offer I made you, and be confident you would become $500 richer. You won't accept, because I sent you my negative results, and you had reasonable doubt before I even did THAT. You have known with near certainty for over a year now that I have no STDs, and I again ask why you are harassing me with this profile. The only bully here is you.
anonymous
8/8/2011 - Well I'm pretty failiar with Cyrus and I have to agree with everything Cryrus has said. lol @ that name by the way. Keep deleting his posts. He's right...it definitely only made you look worse. Haha, I also believe that this business partnr is you. Why are you calling your goooood friend of 4 years by his last name? Nobody does that, unless you're starring in a cheesy detective movie.
STDCarriers.com
8/7/2011 - FYI - I will be asking O'Brien to delete a couple of your recent comments in violation of this sites TOU. Specifically you falsely stated in one post that the site cannot be "trusted" and you falsely claimed to have negative information about me from "reputable news reports". The facts are that this is a trustworthy website and not a single reputable news report has ever been portrayed me in a negative way.
STDCarriers.com
8/7/2011 - Look dude like you said this crap happened over a year ago and like I said it's not an issue of whether I think you have Herpes or not because as an issue of empowering users to speak freely your STD status is irrelevant. I provide services that empower users to publish the truth and nothing but the truth unless proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have told a lie. There is a policy written in plain English on most sites I've helped build that clearly states the burden of proof required of you to find a user in violation and any costs you elect to incur in an effort to meet it are yours alone.
Cryrus
8/7/2011 - And finally, i don't appreciate that you are, years later, writing reports that suggest that I have herpes. I sent you my test results about a year ago now. I'll say it again (since it was deleted): if you need me to have my doctor perform a special and expensive favor by sending you sealed results, then I can do so. My only requirement is that you agree to pay the cost for this. Conversely, if I do not provide you negative results as promised, I will pay you $500. If you won't accept this, you are admitting that you are unsure enough about your accusations that this article should be removed.
Cryrus
8/7/2011 - anyway, you've done enough now to show any visitors that this site is not to be trusted. I mean seriously...censoring posts so that nobody can type the name of the site owner? deleting posts, taken directly from new stories, that show that he is a hypocritical criminal? Cyrus, you are a despicable person, and so is anyone who is willing to be your "business partner". Although, I strongly suspect that George O'Brien is actually you. It seems as obvious to me as it was that you designed this site.
Cryrus
8/7/2011 - Ummm, there are still reputable news reports on the net attesting to cyrus' conviction(s). I can go ahead and post the links here if you want. Will you just delete them like you did my other posts? To be honest, i think it says enough in my favor that you deleted two paragraphs worth of my posts instead of just refuting them. Cyrus, you obviously care AND have time to waste, judging by how quickly you responded to my posts and made a complaint to get them deleted. By the way, most people are going to assume (rightfully) that something valid was deleted, or else it would still be here.
STDCarriers.com
7/26/2011 - Point taken on the horrible layout. This site has been used mostly for testing the AJAX selector so far. Due to time constraints I decided not to focus of formatting this model. I am capable of making a better looking site if I have time, feel like using the time, and think not moving on to newer stuff is worth the time. There is nothing you can do to make yourself a priority at this point. I have more important things to do like wrapping up my next project. If you want to give me free advertising it is you time to waste because you've wasted enough of it already.
STDCarriers.com
7/26/2011 - I really have no idea who posted these comments. It could be the guy in the picture and it could also be the other dude who stalked me recently or it could be someone else entirely. I really have no idea and I really don't care. I didn't just post this up on the internet nearly a year later and I didn't have to because it was already online in the threats section of my site. That section was shut down and notable data was migrated over here. In this case I just wrote a quick summary of events and that was the end of it. If you try to visit the old pages you should be directed to this one.
CyberBullyingReport.com
7/26/2011 - Sir, I just got a complaint about this and I must say that this is the most blatant abuse of this website that I have ever seen. You've falsely accused a man I've known personally for over 4 years of being convicted of a crime he never committed. All forgery charges against Cyrus name-blocker Sullivan were dropped after his parents paid a good lawyer to prove to the DA that he didn't commit that crime. I know you have a history, so as much as he wants you booted off of here I'm giving you a warning and will only be removing part 2 and part 3. - George O'Brien
Cryrus
7/25/2011 - (part 4) You have hidden yourself in such a way that the average person cannot afford to challenge you in court. However, don't think for a minute that i won't go right back to filling the internet with these facts about you. You won't be able to censor your name, and i'll include the fact that your stdcarriers.com website is known for infecting visitors with malware. I am saving all of these comments. Delete them without deleting this profile and a news story version of them immediately gets spammed across the net. I want to make it clear that you have rekindled this battle, not me.
Cryrus
7/25/2011 - (part 1) Hi, this is David. The person who wrote this profile is Cyru s_s ullivan. I realize that your lack of creativity means you will always have to screw people over to make money, but I ask that you at least remove my picture from this site (i'd report it to the owner, but judging from the familiar and horrible layout, I believe it to be you). I am also asking that you simply remove the profile, though I doubt you will. It is now clear that you own this site, as you have made it so people cannot post your name and embarrass you, like you would do to others.

Login to Comment