Cyberbullying Report
Anti-Bullying and Internet Safety Services
Stop Letting Them Get Away with It!

Darren Ambler/ Cyber-Stalking-Ques & Answers/Conference Inf

Darren Ambler/ Cyber-Stalking-Ques & Answers/Conference Inf
Darren Ambler/ Cyber-Stalking-Ques & Answers/Conference Inf
Report #: 7518 - 0 Comments
Date Reported: Tuesday, June 29, 2021
Status: Past Incident
Severity: High - Cyberstalking
Primary Weapon: Investigative Services
Specific Location: Princeton Junction
City/Local Area: Central NJ
State/Territory: New Jersey
Region: United States

*Conclusion of Questions & Answers that Guests/Attendees did not have the opportunity to ask guest speaker at Cyber-Stalking Speaking Engagement due to time constraints:

*Each question was submitted by individual audience members in attendance at the May 22, 2021 Conference/Speaking Engagement:

The guest speaker read and answered each question with the assistance of Secretary Treasurer- Sherry Banks. Exact questions and answers are posted below:

QUESTION: from Chris--Hi, did your Cyber bully (Daren Ambler) ever admit or deny he did in fact bully you on Facebook?

ANSWER- NO NEVER ADMITTED OR DENIED TO MY ATTORNEY OR I. HOWEVER- MR. AMBLER'S ATTORNEY WAS WELL AWARE. THIS IS WHY HIS ATTORNEY ENCOURAGED HIM TO END THE CASE: Mr. Ambler was backed into a corner. It was a no-win situation no matter what he said or did.

QUESTION: Hi- I am Mike a 2nd year law student at Rutgers, can you share the compelling evidence that was gathered? Do you think the stalker was convinced it was over for him and he had no choice but to have the case dismissed or face a guilty verdict and jail time? Thank you.

ANSWER--YES ABSOLUTELY-MY ATTORNEY THOUGHT MR. AMBLER WAS A FOOL FOR MAKING ACCUSATIONS AGAINST ME. NOTHING WOULD HAVE HELPED MR. AMBLER IF WE WOULD HAVE PRESENTED THE EVIDENCE TO THE JUDGE. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN GUILTY WITHOUT A DOUBT. MR. AMBLER WAS RISKING EXPOSURE FOR HIS BAD DEEDS IN FRONT OF THE JUDGE: IN ADDITION, JAIL TIME WOULD HAVE BEEN ORDERED AND MR. AMBLER WOULD HAVE HAD A FELONY CONVICTION TO DEAL WITH: EVEN BEFORE THE CASE STARTED MR. AMBLER HAD SERIOUS CREDIBILITY PROBLEMS:

QUESTION: from Jo-Ann--In addition to a Guilty verdict and Felony record, do you think you could have pursued a Slander case against this jerk for the content of the Facebook messages he wrote about you and sent to his Facebook mutual friends?

ANSWER: YES. HOWEVER, SLANDER IS GENERALLY A CIVIL MATTER. WE WOULD HAVE TO WRAP UP THE CYBER-STALKING CASE FIRST; THEN AFTER THE SENTENCE WAS ENFORCED BY THE COURTS; MY ATTORNEY WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO FILE A NEW CIVIL SLANDER CASE AGAINST MR. AMBLER IN COUNTY COURT: MR. AMBLER ACTUALLY DODGED TWO BULLETS-HOPE HE LEARNED A LESSON. HAD WE FOLLOWED THROUGH MY STALKER'S LIFE WOULD HAVE BEEN FOREVER CHANGED. WE WOULD HAVE PREVAILED IN CIVIL COURT ALSO.

QUESTION: Hi Barbara here--Do you think 3 years later that it finally sank in to Mr. Ambler's head that he committed a felony act even though you decided to drop the case?

ANSWER: I REALLY DON'T KNOW. I DOUBT HE REALLY CARES AT THIS POINT. THIS GUY SEEMS TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO ERASE EVENTS AS IF THEY NEVER HAPPENED.

QUESTION: Hi I am Jarad- Even though you dropped the case are you satisfied some measure of justice was served?

ANSWER: SOMEWHAT--MR. AMBLER WAS BANNED FOR LIFE FROM FACEBOOK: EVEN IF HE MANAGES TO SNEAK ON FACEBOOK THROUGH SOMEONE ELSE'S ACCOUNT-HE CAN NEVER AGAIN ESTABLISH A FACEBOOK ACCOUNT UNDER HIS NAME. SECONDLY- BECAUSE OF THE COMPELLING EVIDENCE MY CASE WAS POSTED ON AT LEAST TWO WEB SITES WHICH HAS TO BE GIVING MR. AMBLER SOME NEGATIVE EXPOSURE. PEOPLE KNOW WHAT HE DID IN SPITE OF HIS LIES. AS LONG AS SOMETHING IS TRUE AND PROOF EXISTS YOU CAN LEGALLY PUBLISH THE INFORMATION. I GUESS IT GIVES ME SOME SMALL MEASURE OF JUSTICE. I THINK IF THE PUBLIC IS AWARE YOU CYBER-STALKED SOMEONE I CAN NOT SEE THE PUBLIC HAVING TOO MUCH RESPECT FOR SOMEONE THAT ENGAGES IN THIS TYPE OF CONDUCT. WHICH IS MR. AMBLER'S OWN DOING.

QUESTION: I am Meredith--You only briefly discussed the hearing on May 21, 2018 in which you and Mr. Ambler attended the day the Judge dismissed the case? What took place? Did you make eye contact with your stalker?

ANSWER: NO EYE CONTACT--I MAKE AN EFFORT NOT TO LOOK AT MR. AMBLER. HIS PRESENCE AND ALL HE STANDS FOR IS REVOLTING TO ME. AT THIS POINT IN TIME HE DOES NOT EXIST: HE HAS BEEN SO FAR REMOVED FROM MY LIFE FOR OVER FIVE YEARS IT'S AS IF I NEVER KNEW HIM AT ALL. I AM SURE MR. AMBLER CAUSES KAOS AND ILL FEELINGS IN THE LIVES ANYONE HE COMES IN CONTACT WITH: I CAN'T IMAGINE HAVING ENJOYMENT BEING AROUND HIM.


QUESTION/COMMENT: from Paulie--You are a great speaker, it's obvious you are devoted to the cause. I am sorry you ever met this ungrateful and arrogant person. You handled everything with utmost professionalism, a lot of class and you certainly have etiquette. You were obviously too good, classy and smart to interact with someone of this caliber. Good luck to you and the cause.

ANSWER: THANK-YOU./ I HAVE A WISE SAYING- CHAMPAGNE AND PORK RINDS DON'T MIX: STICK WITH CHAMPAGNE AND CAVIAR--STAY AWAY FROM THOSE THAT SNACK ON PORK RINDS AND CHEAP BEER. STICK WITH THE WINNERS NOT THE LOSERS/ DON'T MAKE FRIENDS WITH THOSE OUTSIDE OF YOUR CLASS/ AVOID ANYONE WHO AIN'T PLAYING WITH A FULL DECK.

QUESTION: Hello my name is Diane-I am a Paralegal with 17 years experience--My question is --Do you feel the actions of your stalker were that of a frightened, paranoid person who basically got caught with his hand in the cookie jar? Also, do you feel his behavior immediately following the falling out made matters worse for him? Thanks.

ANSWER: HIS ACTIONS WERE THAT OF A PERSON WHOM HAD A GREAT DEAL TO HIDE: HOWEVER, HIS VENGEFUL ACTIONS AGAINST ME ONLY MADE MR. AMBLER LOOK MORE GUILTY: I DID NOTHING WRONG EXCEPT CONFRONT HIM BECAUSE I CARED ABOUT HIM POSSIBLY MESSING UP HIS FUTURE: IN RETURN I CYBER-BULLIED, WAS CALLED SLANDEROUS NAMES AND I WAS A TARGET OF HIS VICIOUS LIES WHICH HE REPEATED TO OTHER FACEBOOK MEMBERS THRU HIS FACEBOOK MESSENGER MESSAGES:

QUESTION: From Rachel--Do you think Mr. Ambler is a true Sociopath?

ANSWER: I WILL SAY HE HAS SOME SERIOUS MENTAL ISSUES: MANY OF HIS ACTIONS SUCH AS LACK OF EMOTION, NO REMORSE, AND GAS-LIGHTING ANYONE THAT SPEAKS OUT AGAINST HIM ARE VERY SIMILAR ACTIONS TO THAT OF A SOCIOPATH:

QUESTION:from Dr. Lance-Kirby--Did this guy have a history of drug or alcohol abuse? Drug taking would contribute to his bazaar behavior and his willingness to hurt anyone that stands in his way.

ANSWER: HE ADMITTED TO PAST DRUG ABUSE. HOWEVER, HIS LIFE WAS SUCH AN 'OUT OF CONTROL' SECRET THAT I WONDERED IF HE MAY HAVE BEEN USING DRUGS ALL ALONG. ADDICTS CAN BE CLEVER ABOUT HIDING DRUG USE: I AM CONVINCED HE DRANK ALCOHOL WHEN IN THE COMPANY OF HIS FRIENDS/CO WORKER'S: THIS IS WHY I WAS NEVER PERMITTED TO MEET THIS PARTICULAR GROUP OF FRIENDS: HE ALWAYS MET THEM AT BARS WHICH I FELT WAS ODD ESPECIALLY SINCE MR. AMBLER CLAIMED HE DID NOT DRINK ALCOHOL. I AM CONVINCED THIS WAS JUST ANOTHER LIE ON HIS PART: MR. AMBLER IS NOT AN HONEST AND TRUE PERSON.

QUESTION: (Jonathan)--Did your lawyer secure an injunction against him forbidding or limiting his Internet usage during the cyber-stalking investigation?

ANSWER: NO. CERTAIN CRITERIA MUST BE MET TO ENFORCE AN INJUNCTION. THE FOCUS WAS ON COMPLETING THE INVESTIGATION NOT ON PROHIBITING HIS INTERNET USAGE.

QUESTION: Hi I am Laura-- Did the attorney notify your cyberbully ahead of time that he was being investigated?

ANSWER: NO--BY LAW YOU DON'T HAVE TO NOTIFY THE ACCUSED UNTIL THE INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETED--FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. IT IS A DEFINITE ADVANTAGE NOT TO NOTIFY THE CYBER BULLY AHEAD OF TIME:


*Thank you all for your support. The information on the September conference has been posted on this web-site:


There Are 0 Comments

Login to Comment
 
 

Insert Loader
Your Data is Uploading...